In traditional property management, maintenance has been treated as a single, bundled service. A resident submits a request, a technician is dispatched, and we hope for a fix. This approach is based on guesswork.When we don’t have full or accurate information, we are betting that the initial request contains enough detail to solve the problem on the first visit. Unfortunately, that bet fails 70% of the time, and we average 1.7 trips per work order.This inefficiency isn’t just a cost issue—it’s a structural one. And the root cause is our failure to separate what should be two distinct functions: demand and supply.Understanding this split is foundational to building your centralization roadmap.
The Legacy Model: One Request, One Visit, One Guess
The conventional workflow merges everything into a single loop:- A work order is created—often with vague or incomplete information.
- A technician is dispatched, hoping to both diagnose and resolve the issue in one go.
- The result is often a “diagnostic” trip, followed by a second or more visits to actually perform the repair.
- Teams over-pack trips with a wide array of tools and parts, or
- Accept that the first visit is for scoping only, resigning to a second dispatch.
The Modern Framework: Demand vs. Supply
To centralize successfully, you must unbundle the problem. Think of maintenance as two distinct workflows:Demand- Resident-generated service requests.
- Remote triage and issue classification.
- Work order creation and prioritization.
- Technician dispatch or vendor scheduling.
- Parts procurement and delivery.
- On-site resolution and quality control.
What Can Be Centralized?
Breaking down the model reveals clear opportunities for centralization:Centralize Demand- Centralized intake and triage of all service requests.
- Remote diagnostics to improve data accuracy and reduce unnecessary dispatches.
- Prioritization engines that sort by urgency, asset type, or resident status.
- Intelligent scheduling of techs and vendors based on availability, proximity, and expertise.
- Centralized tracking of open jobs, SLAs, and performance metrics.
- Systematized procurement tied to recurring work types and seasonal trends.
- Shared inventories and replenishment systems across portfolios or regions.
What Still Happens On-Site?
Some steps will always require local execution:- Physical repairs and hands-on tasks.
- Delivery and receipt of parts to the property site.
- Resident-facing service that requires in-person resolution.
The Payoff of a Split Model
Separating demand from supply unlocks a series of critical benefits:- Higher first-time fix rates, due to better technician preparation.
- Lower trip volume, as unnecessary dispatches are eliminated.
- Smarter inventory and procurement, driven by aggregated data.
- Faster resolution, improving both resident experience and NOI.
- Scheduled maintenance is just structured recurring demand.
- Predictive maintenance anticipates needs based on data.
- Prescriptive maintenance recommends actions before issues occur.
- Service catalogues define task types, SLAs, and delivery standards.
- Material catalogs align parts and tools with known job types.
- Strategic sourcing drives vendor performance and cost efficiency.
What If We Don’t Separate Demand and Supply?
Failing to make this distinction leaves organizations stuck in reactive mode:- Work orders continue to arrive with incomplete or poor data.
- Dispatches remain inefficient, often requiring multiple trips.
- Inventory waste persists, with unnecessary parts ordered or unused.
- Technicians spend time diagnosing instead of fixing.
- Residents experience delays and inconsistent service.
A New Operating System for Maintenance
The key to centralizing maintenance isn’t more tools—it’s a revised model.When you stop treating maintenance as one giant workflow and instead view it as demand and supply, the opportunities to optimize, automate, and scale become clear. You can centralize where it counts, localize where it matters, and create a system that supports smarter growth across your entire portfolio.This shift—from blended chaos to structured control—is how modern operators build high-performing, centralized maintenance functions that are ready for scale.Our mission is to simplify the homeowners & home builders customer experience. Let Iris do the work.
Up next
Getting to Hell Yes! in Selling: Insights from Dennis Steigerwalt
By: Guillermo Salazar • 12 January 2025
Dennis Steigerwalt: Driving Housing Innovation with Vision, Collaboration, and 'Hell Yes!' Solutions
The importance of online product reviews [+3 ways to get more]
By: IrisCX • 19 September 2022
Online reviews are impactful because they reach people with purchasing intent – a total of 93% of new customers consult reviews before purchasing a product or service. With virtual CX, your team can start receiving and leveraging better quality reviews.
From Intake to Impact: How Industry Leaders Are Rethinking Property Maintenance Intake
By: IrisCX • 09 May 2025
Discover how industry leaders are transforming property maintenance intake to improve efficiency, visibility, and resident satisfaction across portfolios.